<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should we listen to these guys?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marktomarketdebate.com/2009/10/19/should-we-listen-to-these-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marktomarketdebate.com/2009/10/19/should-we-listen-to-these-guys/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:59:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cate Long</title>
		<link>http://www.marktomarketdebate.com/2009/10/19/should-we-listen-to-these-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Cate Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marktomarketdebate.com/?p=1098#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Here is what the Financial Times editorialized about M2M:

&quot;Legislators and regulators fear that marking banks’ assets down to fair-value estimates will trigger automatic actions as capital ratios deteriorate. 

But using accounting rules to mislead regulators with inaccurate information is a poor policy. 

If capital calculations are based on inaccurate values of assets, the ratios are already lower than they appear. 

Banks should provide regulators with the best information about their assets and liabilities and, separately, allow them the flexibility and discretion to adjust capital adequacy ratios based on the economic situation. 

Regulators can lower capital ratios during downturns and raise them during good economic times.&quot; 

Financial Times, August 17, 2009

Transparency can be accompanied by flexibility... it&#039;s truthfulness that creates confidence in markets....

http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Mark-to-market_accounting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what the Financial Times editorialized about M2M:</p>
<p>&#8220;Legislators and regulators fear that marking banks’ assets down to fair-value estimates will trigger automatic actions as capital ratios deteriorate. </p>
<p>But using accounting rules to mislead regulators with inaccurate information is a poor policy. </p>
<p>If capital calculations are based on inaccurate values of assets, the ratios are already lower than they appear. </p>
<p>Banks should provide regulators with the best information about their assets and liabilities and, separately, allow them the flexibility and discretion to adjust capital adequacy ratios based on the economic situation. </p>
<p>Regulators can lower capital ratios during downturns and raise them during good economic times.&#8221; </p>
<p>Financial Times, August 17, 2009</p>
<p>Transparency can be accompanied by flexibility&#8230; it&#8217;s truthfulness that creates confidence in markets&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Mark-to-market_accounting" rel="nofollow">http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Mark-to-market_accounting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
